Ricdelanoche Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 Signaler Share Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 Bonjour, je suis en train de bosser sur mon oral, il doit avoir pas mal de faute, si jamais vous en reperez je vous en serez reconaissant ^^, n'hésitez pas à me dire si c'est trop long ou pas assez ou si il y a du H.S, j'espère que cela peut servir, j'ai essayé de caser quand meme quelques tournures grammaticales, bon courage à tous ! The notion, I’m going to deal with is the idea of progress. Thus, progress is an evolution, a change towards a better world. To my mind, the theme that best illustrates the notion is the technical progress, that’s why this theme leads me to wonder if the technical progress can always be a good thing for our society. I will study this question along two lines. First, I will talk about technical progress advantages and then I will show the technical progress drawbacks. I) First of all, Technical progress has a lot of advantages, and it is worth noticing that nowadays there are more and more people who benefit · As it is the case of the progress of medicine, it makes our life easier, gives some hope. → For instance, the Casson’s case: a mother has helped her 24 year old son called Kyle in order to have a child, with the in vitro fertilization technical, she becomes a surrogate mother. However, this history turns out to be a controversial issue and has raised mixed feeling, Kyle asserts that he didn’t choose to be gay and being a dad was a high priority in his life. · Furthermore, technical progress can save people life → The prime example is the Whitaker’s case, Charlie Whitaker a 12-year-old teenager, who underwent a debilitating rare genetic condition was saved by his younger brother Jamie. This one was born by in vitro fertilization technical in the only goal to save his brother. Whereas Charlie was saved, this history has triggered fierce reactions. Jamie was surnamed the harvest baby. According to his mother, he is rather the Saviour siblings. = So, there is no doubt that the Technical Progress is one of the cornerstones of our society, according to Benjamin Franklin ‘Without continual growth and progress, such words as improvement, achievement, and success have no meaning.’ While recognizing technical progress has too many advantages, one must admit, nowadays it becomes also a bone of contention, from the Edward Snowden’s case to the Big data monopoly, a lot of people are dubious about the technical progress promises. II) Actually, technical progress has also a lot of drawbacks, we can notice, the problem of addiction. · Firstly, if smartphones and the Internet disappear, how many people will be able to live? → According to Jana Smith, a journalist and her article entitled a new member family each of us spent about 6 hours a week online, the web makes us even lonelier and more isolated than we already are, in addition, the author draws our attention to the fact that urbanization makes us an anonymous thing and the pendulum migration, has scattered our life. · Secondly, should we regulate technical progress, an account of its dangerousness? → An interviewer has asked people if cell phones should be banned in all public places. This question proves how thorny the subject is. A woman complains about the use on Australians trains. Another emphasizes that’s a matter of smart use and also education. Finally, a man thinks that this idea is completely mindless. = So, it should be kept in mind that, technical progress has some perverse effect, as pointed out, the notorious journalist and activist George Monbiot "Progress is measured by the speed at which we destroy the conditions that sustain life." To sum it up, I might say that, it’s a bit like the debate Voltaire against Rousseau. On the one hand, technical progress is an amazing thing, which makes the world better but on the other hand, we have to face excesses and moral question. The writer Marc Dugain on his essay ‘l’Home nu’, say that we must pay attention to the digital matrix in order to avoid the 1984 Orwell’s dystopia. Citer Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
E-Bahut Jean B Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 E-Bahut Signaler Share Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 Bonjour, The notion, I’m going to deal with is the idea of progress. Thus, progress is an evolution, a change towards a better world. To my mind, the theme that best illustrates the notion is the technical progress, that’s why this theme leads me to wonder whether/if the technical progress can always be a good thing for our society. I will study this question along two lines. First, I will talk about technical progress advantages and then I will show the technical progress drawbacks. I) First of all, Technical progress has a lot of advantages, and it is worth noticing that nowadays there are more and more people who benefit from it. · As it is the case of with the progress of medicine, it makes our life easier, gives some hope. → For instance, the Casson’s case: a mother has helped her 24 year old son called Kyle in order to have a child, with the in vitro fertilization technical << pas l'adjectif mais le nom >> technique, she becomes became a surrogate mother. However, this history turns out to be a controversial issue and has raised mixed feeling, Kyle asserts that he didn’t choose to be gay and being a dad was a high priority in his life. · Furthermore, technical progress can save people's lives. < La chose possédée étant commune à plusieurs possesseurs prend le pluriel. C'est à mémoriser. → The prime example is the Whitaker’s case, Charlie Whitaker a 12-year-old teenager, who underwent a debilitating rare genetic condition was saved by his younger brother Jamie. This one was born by in vitro fertilization technical < bis ! in with the only goal to save of saving his brother. Whereas Charlie was saved, this history has triggered fierce reactions. Jamie was surnamed the harvest baby. According to his mother, he is rather the Saviour siblings. = So, there is no doubt that the Technical Progress is one of the cornerstones of our society, according to Benjamin Franklin ‘Without continual growth and progress, such words as improvement, achievement, and success have no meaning.’ While recognizing technical progress has too many advantages, one must admit, nowadays it becomes also a bone of contention, from the Edward Snowden’s case to the Big data monopoly, a lot of people are dubious about the technical progress promises. II) Actually, technical progress has also a lot of drawbacks, we can notice, the problem of addiction. · Firstly, if smartphones and the Internet disappear, how many people will be able to live? → According to Jana Smith, a journalist and her article entitled a new member family each of us spent about 6 hours a week online, the web makes us even lonelier and more isolated than we already are, in addition, the author draws our attention to the fact that urbanization makes us an anonymous thing and the pendulum migration, has scattered our life. · Secondly, should we regulate technical progress on account of its dangerousness? → An interviewer has asked people if cell phones should be banned in all public places. This question proves how thorny the subject is. A woman complains about the use on Australians <(*) trains. Another emphasizes that’s a matter of smart use and also education. Finally, a man thinks that this idea is completely mindless. (*) Quelle est donc la constante grammaticale de l'adjectif épithète en anglais ? = So, it should be kept in mind that technical progress has some perverse effects. pointed out, the As notorious journalist and activist George Monbiot pointed out "Progress is measured by the speed at which we destroy the conditions that sustain life." To sum it up, I might say that, it’s a bit like the debate Voltaire against Rousseau debate. < Comment se construit un nom composé ? On the one hand, technical progress is an amazing thing which makes the world better but on the other hand we have to face excesses and moral question. The writer Marc Dugain in his essay ‘l’Homme nu’, says that we must pay attention to the digital matrix in order to avoid the 1984 Orwell’s dystopia. Citer Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
Ricdelanoche Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 Auteur Signaler Share Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 Tout d'abord merci pour la correction Comment se construit un nom composé ? Pas vraiment d'idée ... (*) Quelle est donc la constante grammaticale de l'adjectif épithète en anglais ? Les adjectif épithète ne s'accorde jamais en anglais , j'ai du mal à me relire et à les repérer c'est comme pour les s au singulier ... A la prochaine Citer Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
E-Bahut Jean B Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 E-Bahut Signaler Share Posté(e) le 28 avril 2019 Il y a 2 heures, Ricdelanoche a dit : Comment se construit un nom composé ? Pas vraiment d'idée ... Voici de quoi assouvir ta curiosité : https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/nouns-compound.htm https://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/nouncompound.html Citer Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
Ricdelanoche Posté(e) le 29 avril 2019 Auteur Signaler Share Posté(e) le 29 avril 2019 Il y a 21 heures, JRB a dit : Merci faut que je trouve le temps de les lire Citer Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
Messages recommandés
Rejoindre la conversation
Vous pouvez publier maintenant et vous inscrire plus tard. Si vous avez un compte, connectez-vous maintenant pour publier avec votre compte.