Aaseab Posté(e) le 13 avril 2018 Signaler Share Posté(e) le 13 avril 2018 Bonjour, J'ai fini mon texte pour l'expression orale d'anglais sur le thème Forms and Locations of Power et la notion The Red Scare. Pouvez vous me corriger si j'ai fait des fautes et me donner votre avis? J'ai essayé notamment de relier chaque partie à la notion de pouvoir mais ca m'a l'air un peu repetitif et je n'arrive pas à reformuler d'une autre facon. The notion I am going to deal with is the forms and locations of power. So power refers to the ability of a nation to have an influence or control over the others. In relation to the noton, the subject of my presentation will be the Red Scare. It's the fear of communisme during the Cold War. People were scared and paranoid because they believed that there was a communist conspiracy to overthrow the USA. It shows how much the Soviets had power on the USA. More precisely what were the conséquences of this fear on the USA? I would first like to concentrate on the impacts on the government, after I will take the effects on the civillians suspected of being communists in consideration and finally I will take a look the USA of tomorrow: childrens. To begin, I would like to talk about the foundation of our societies: our governments. Actually, they have responsibilities because they must protect the citizens and have to be careful. That's what happened during the Cold War. To illustrate this idea, I would refer to a drawing named Talking from strength where we can see two armies fighting with bows and arrows although each side side has nuclear bombs where we can see On no account to be used, because the ennemy might retaliate. That's what we call deterrence, a dissusion between each camps. They were scared to use Dangerous weapon because the ennemy might use them too. It shows the millitary power of the two sides and how much it influences the confict and exacerbates the paranoia. In addition to this, we can say that the civillians were also affected by the Cold War. It was a Strange period when paranoia, suspicion and McCarthysm ruled. That's why a lot of citizens were suspected of being spies. This is the case of Jane Foster in An Unamerican Lady written in 1980. She wents to the USA in the 50's to see her mother who had been operated on and was suspected of being communist. In the extract seen in class, her passport was confiscated by a border guard. It shows us how tense the atmosphere was and loadead with suspicion mostly for the foreigners. How ironic for the country of freedom! It shows how much people were influenced by the communist threat. To finish, I would like to talk about the future of the USA, after the Cold War, children. They are always very protected and that was the case during the Cold War. We can see this in a civil defense film called Duck and Cover producedby the federal civil defende administration. We can see Bert the turtle showing children how to defend themselves and take shelter in case of an atomic bomb. They have to duck and cover as the turtle does. It shows how protected children were because they represent a better society without communism and the Red Scare. We can understand that there was a fear because of the power of soviets for the present but also for the future. But even if the message was gived by a turtle, maybe that children were scared and upset ok knowing that there was a threat capable to kill them and their family. To conclude, I would like to say that as we can see wars have impacts on governments, citizens and children. But even if I have more insisted on the USA, it was the same thing for the other side: USSR. That's the point of view adopted in the song Russians by Sting: The russians love their childrens too. I am convinced that we see wars in general in a Manichean way although there is bad and goodon each side. I talked a lot about childrens because I think they should be less underestimated, they are not innocents childrens but are the future and have the power of making a better world without wars as the Cold War. Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
E-Bahut Jean B Posté(e) le 14 avril 2018 E-Bahut Signaler Share Posté(e) le 14 avril 2018 Bonjour, Bonjour, J'ai fini mon texte pour l'expression orale d'anglais sur le thème Forms and Locations of Power et la notion The Red Scare. Pouvez vous me corriger si j'ai fait des fautes et me donner votre avis? J'ai essayé notamment de relier chaque partie à la notion de pouvoir mais ca m'a l'air un peu repetitif et je n'arrive pas à reformuler d'une autre facon. The notion I am going to deal with is the forms and locations of power. So power refers to the ability of a nation to have an influence or control over the others. In relation to the noton, the subject of my presentation will be the Red Scare. It's the fear of communisme during the Cold War. People were scared and paranoid because they believed that there was a communist conspiracy to overthrow the USA. It shows how much the Soviets had power on the USA. More precisely what were the conséquences of this fear on the USA? I would first like to concentrate on the impacts on the government, after I will take the effects on the civilians suspected of being communists in consideration and finally I will take a look at the USA of tomorrow: childrens. < C’est un pluriel SANS -s ! Tu l’as appris en sixième et ça n’a pas changé. To begin, I would like to talk about the foundation of our societies: our governments. Actually, they have responsibilities because they must protect the citizens and have to be careful. That's what happened during the Cold War. To illustrate this idea, I would refer to a drawing named Talking from strength where we can see two armies fighting with bows and arrows although each side side has nuclear bombs where we can see On no account to be used, because the ennemy might retaliate. That's what we call deterrence, a dissusion between each camps. < L’un ne s’accorde pas avec l’autre They were scared to use Dangerous weapons because the ennemy might use them too. It shows the millitary power of the two sides and how much it influences the confict and exacerbates the paranoia. In addition to this, we can say that the civillians were also affected by the Cold War. It was a Strange period when paranoia, suspicion and McCarthysm ruled. That's why a lot of citizens were suspected of being spies. This is the case of Jane Foster in An Unamerican Lady written in 1980. She wents < Celle-là, je ne l’avais encore jamais vue ! to the USA in the 50's to see her mother who had been operated on and was suspected of being communist. In the extract seen in class, her passport was confiscated by a border guard. It shows us how tense the atmosphere was and loadead with suspicion mostly for the foreigners. How ironic for the country of freedom! It shows how much people were influenced by the communist threat. To finish, I would like to talk about the future of the USA, after the Cold War, children. They are have always been very much protected and that was the case during the Cold War. We can see this in a civil defense film called Duck and Cover produced by the federal civil defende administration. We can see Bert the turtle showing children how to defend themselves and take shelter in case of an atomic bomb. They have to duck and cover as the turtle does. It shows how protected children were because they represent a better society without communism and the Red Scare. We can understand that there was a fear because of the power of soviets for the present but also for the future. But even if the message was gived < Révise les verbes irréguliers ! Il faut absolument les connaître tous par coeur sous leurs 3 formes. by a turtle, maybe that children were scared and upset ok knowing that there was a threat capable to kill of killing them and their family. To conclude, I would like to say that as we can see wars have impacts on governments, citizens and children. But even if I have insisted more on the USA, it was the same thing for the other side: the USSR. That's the point of view adopted in the song Russians by Sting: The Russians love their childrens too. I am convinced that we see wars in general in a Manichean way although there is bad and good on each side. I talked a lot about childrens because I think they should be less underestimated, they are not innocents childrens but are the future and have the power of making a better world without wars as the Cold War. NB Même si elles restent invisibles à l’oral, les fautes de frappe/d’orthographe que tu commets sont inexcusables. Il faut te relire systématiquement, car le jour J des épreuves écrites personne ne le fera à ta place. Entre autres règles de grammaire, revois celles qui régissent l’emploi/omission du déterminant « the ». The.doc Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
Messages recommandés
Archivé
Ce sujet est désormais archivé et ne peut plus recevoir de nouvelles réponses.