Aller au contenu
meofanny

Limiting the freedom of the press/pros & cons

Messages recommandés

Bonjour, je me demandais si une correction de mon devoir était possible.. Merci d'avance 

Do you think the police of a governmental organization should control what journalists write before they publish it ?

 

This kind of subject must ask for two answers: first yes, then no

First, I would say yes, the police of a governmental organization should control what journalists write before publishing it. In fact, journalists can write fake stories and the result is not always good; this can provoke revolts, conflicts, even hatred of the other. Take the example of Joseph Goebbels, a famous journalist (Reich Minister for Education of the People and Propaganda) of the Second World War. His role as a journalist was to create hatred and his name is nowadays link to the use of modern mass manipulation technics.

Furthermore, nowadays reporters by writing an article can destroy someone's life. For instance, by giving to someone a bad reputation by publishing false news or gossip on him which can refer to the rape of privacy. So even if this person is guilty or not it's not journalists duty to judge about it. That's why police must control what they write before they publish it. In conclusion, the police should control what reporters write before they published it to avoid them to manipulate our viewpoint

 

However, journalists have the right to do and write whatever they want, they are free to do this, and police of governmental organization should not violate the rights of journalists and writers. Indeed, in some countries people are fighting to have this press liberty, for example is countries like Korea where dictatorship doesn't allow liberty of express of people or journalists. They make sure that they have journalists in their side (just to assure to the world that it's not a dictatorial country) who can justified that they are not control but in reality they are.
In fact the role of journalists is to make people awareness, either to remind them of the chance they have or to make them react.
It's why we may fight for these rights, to banish all kind of censorship
So we can say that journalists make a good job by publishing article without police's consent. 

In fact, in that case journalists may embody freedom and democracy when they are not subscribed or control by police of governmental organization
Sometime, when journalists take pen to write without control of anyone it's can allow lot of things. Let's take the example of the movie « the help » (la couleur des sentiments) which take place in the context of racial segregation in the United States in the 1960s and is organized around three female characters that are differentiated by skin colour, age, social function and language. One of them is a with female journalist who decided to argue the cause of black people especially black women who work for rich white one. So journalists may help towards progress and betterment of people's life when they are not under the police's control.

Modifié par JRB
Explicitation du titre du sujet

Partager ce message


Lien à poster
Partager sur d’autres sites

Bonjour, bienvenue sur e-bahut.

Do you think the police of a governmental organization should control what journalists write before they publish it ?

 

This kind of subject must ask for two answers: first yes, then no.

First, I would say yes, the police of a governmental organization should control what journalists write before publishing it. In fact, journalists can write fake stories and the result is not always good; this can provoke revolts, conflicts, even hatred of the other. Take the example of Joseph Goebbels, a famous journalist (Reich Minister for Education of the People and Propaganda) of the Second World War. His role as a journalist was to create hatred and his name is nowadays linked to the use of modern mass manipulation technics.

Furthermore nowadays reporters can destroy someone's life by writing an article.< Il vaut mieux que le groupe verbal vienne directement derrière le groupe sujet.  For instance, by giving to someone a bad reputation by publishing false news or gossip on him which can refer to the rape < Ça c'est le viol physique, sexuel violation of privacy. So even if this person is guilty or not it's not journalists duty to judge about it. That's why the police must control what they write before they publish it. In conclusion, the police should control what reporters write before they published it to avoid prevent them to from manipulating our viewpoint.

 

However, journalists have the right to do and write whatever they want, they are free to do this, and the police of a governmental organization should not violate the rights of journalists and writers. Indeed, in some countries people are fighting to have this freedom of the press liberty, for example in countries like Korea where dictatorship doesn't allow liberty of express of people's or journalists' free expression/freedom of expression. < Le génitif est bien pratique en anglais They make sure that they have journalists on their side (just to assure to the world that it's not a dictatorial country) who can justifiedy that they are not controlled but in reality they are. < Dois-je te rappeler qu'un modal est obligatoirement suivi d'une base verbale ? Relis toi toujours afin d'éliminer ce genre de bévue.
In fact the role of journalists is to make people awareness, < L'adjectif, pas le nom either to remind them of the chance they have how lucky they are or to make them react.
It's why we may fight for these rights, to banish all kind of censorship.
So we can say that journalists make a good job by publishing articles without
the police's consent. 

In fact, in that case journalists may embody freedom and democracy when they are not subscribed < ??? or controlled by the police of a governmental organization.
Sometime
s, when journalists take pen to write without control of anyone it's it/that can allow lot of things. Let's take the example of the movie « the help » (la couleur des sentiments) which takes place in the context of racial segregation in the United States in the 1960s and is organized around three female characters that are differentiated by skin colour, age, social function and language. One of them is a with white female journalist who decided to argue the cause of black people especially black women who work for rich white ones. So journalists may help towards progress and betterment of people's life when they are not under the police's control.

Au risque de me tromper, j'ai l'impression que tu as écrit ça d'abord en français pour le "traduire" ensuite. Si c'est le cas, tu as tout faux, c'est la pire méthode qui soit. Au contraire, entraîne toi à écrire directement en anglais, tu apprécieras le jour du bac.

Partager ce message


Lien à poster
Partager sur d’autres sites

Créer un compte ou se connecter pour commenter

Vous devez être membre afin de pouvoir déposer un commentaire

Créer un compte

Créez un compte sur notre communauté. C’est facile !

Créer un nouveau compte

Se connecter

Vous avez déjà un compte ? Connectez-vous ici.

Connectez-vous maintenant

×