CarenHermy Posté(e) le 11 mai 2008 Signaler Posté(e) le 11 mai 2008 Hey JRB. I have another essay to write and as usual, I would like to know my mistakes I you have some free time to have a look on it However, I can't anounce my plan, could you help me please ? Thank you in advance ! In the past, the press had to deal with censorship. People would adapt their writings according to the will of the power not to be arrested or jailed. Then, a switching occurred in many countries: people obtained the freedom of the press. This media is nowadays allowed to write quite freely. However, some writings published in the press are sometimes improper and represent an invasion of privacy, notably in tabloids. In other words, How far can the press creep into celebrities’ privacy? To begin with, it is believed that press tend to be too intrusive in celebrities’ life. It often employs paparazzi to spy them in order to sell more and more because it has become a source of interest for many of the readers. This triggers a lack of privacy to those people who end up totally angry of all that. For instance, it is what happened recently to Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife, Carla Bruni who were constantly watched over just to find out a wedding date. It is totally foolish Quite obviously, celebrities are often fed up and decide to complain against those tabloids to defend their rights of privacy. This leads in most of the time to condemnation of the tabloid concerned because of a non respect of privacy, something which has nowadays become important to everyone. In spite of this, some celebrities take the opportunity to claim for damages and get amounts of money. That is what happened in 2006 for a French journalist who got 526 500 Euros from several tabloids. In a nutshell, we can believe that press is too intrusive in celebrities’ life and that is why some do not hesitate to complain about it. It would be interesting to wonder how we could solve this problem satisfying the both sides.
E-Bahut Jean B Posté(e) le 11 mai 2008 E-Bahut Signaler Posté(e) le 11 mai 2008 Bonsoir, In the past, the press had to deal with censorship. People would adapt their writings according to the will of the power not to be arrested or jailed. Then, a switching occurred in many countries: people obtained the freedom of the press. This media is nowadays allowed to write quite freely. However, some writings published in the press are sometimes improper and represent an invasion of privacy, notably in tabloids. In other words, How far can the press creep into celebrities’ privacy? To begin with, it is believed that press tend to be too intrusive in celebrities’ life. It often employs paparazzi to spy them in order to sell more and more because it has become a source of interest for many of the readers. This triggers a lack of privacy to those people who end up totally angry of all that. For instance, it is what happened recently to Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife, Carla Bruni who were constantly watched over just to find out a wedding date. It is totally foolish. Quite obviously, celebrities are often fed up and decide to complain against those tabloids to defend their rights of privacy. This leads in most of the time <(mal placé) to condemnation of the tabloid concerned because of a non respect of privacy, something which has nowadays become important to everyone. In spite of this, some celebrities take the opportunity to claim for damages and get amounts of money. That is what happened in 2006 for a French journalist who got 526 500 Euros from several tabloids. In a nutshell, we can believe that press is too intrusive in celebrities’ life and that is why some do not hesitate to complain about it. It would be interesting to wonder how we could solve this problem satisfying the both sides.
Messages recommandés
Archivé
Ce sujet est désormais archivé et ne peut plus recevoir de nouvelles réponses.