Exposé D'anglais Probleme Pour L'utilisation Du Temps

[antisthene86]

Bonjour a tous voila je dois faire un petit exposé d'anglais concernant un article de mon choix, j'ai fais ca cependant j'ai quelques problemes recurrent concernant l'utilisation du preterit du présent du present perfect je sais jamais trop quoi choisir si vous pouviez me corriger ca , et si vous voyez d'autres grosses fautes ( car il y en a ) si vous pouviez m'aider a corriger ca; merci beaucoup je precise que je suis en L3 eco gestion. Si il y a des points que vous ne comprenez pas dites le moi j'essayerais de corriger;

This article entitled "supermarket cut of fairtrade cash for poor farmers," was published on the times website ,on June 29, 2003; Although this article date of 5 years this subject remains topical. Indeed, the development of fair trade since the nineties with the coffee cotton cocoa has accelerated greatly in recent years bring about the actors :producers distributors and consumers to evolve to develop to adapt.

Robert windlett puts forward this evolution, concerning distributors supermarkets who excessively take advantage of this strong’s trade.

For him, the idea of a fairtrade is very well accepted by the English in general, it declares on this subject that much British are willing to pay more for products because they know that this money will be used for the development of poor farmers and obviously to finance infrastructure.

However through a survey on prices led by John MCabe and the consultants Connector Global, it highlights the fact that the rising of prices is more beneficial profitable for supermarkets than for small producers.

He says, consumers are manipulating , they pay prices twice higher for these products but they don’t realize that extra pennies for the most part go directly into the coffers of supermarkets.

He gives two examples which show well the 2 speed of the system, first he mentions sainsbury which is the third largest chain of stores in the United Kingdom and which on a selling price of 89 pounds cash a margin of 65 pounds it’s the 3 / 4. The second example positive concerns waitrose which according to a survey is the only major supermarket who doesn’t have these margins.

Supermarkets have obviously realized that these fair trade products was a very good selling’s argument, and thus synonymous with profit. In the rest of his article, Robert Windlett, says that the number of licensed fair trade product distributed by supermarkets have increased because supermarkets are exploiting a loophole and can decide the final price of the product.

In the second part, it’s about the power of these major groups, including Wal mart which by the game of competition exert a down’s pressure to the bulk’s purchase (price) of bananas. The decision-making power of these companies are obviously very important and even if authorities represent by the prime minister of grenada are intervene their actions are not very convincing.

Indeed, supermarkets, remain careful and point out that despite prices they still contributes positively to the third worlds, Tesco declares on this subject,that he contributes to the developement of education and health services even if his turnover concerning these products is approximately 1 billion.

In view of this one-way’s article which denounces without half measure distributors and their opportunist policies; we could forget positive effects of fair trade label , indeed the third world needs our help, our support. Obviously, although few pence extra we pay are low is really a massive difference for these poor people, to give to them more pleasant living conditions for them and their families. The question we are faced with, is an ethical question, even if supermarkets contribute to a fairetrade ,have the right to earn so much money by knowing that they could further improve the living conditions of these people. Some play the game as others do not. That‘s why ,actually some official organizations like the fairtrade foundation , the dfid the department for international development and fairtrade and most recently in 1997 the FLO Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, in 2007 fairtrade action network with the governments try to develop this trade by maintaining the maximum of equity.

Personally, I think that system has become unhealthy, in fact I believe that this system has become a system based only on enrichment by the exploitation of poor farmers who become in a certain manner prisonner to our market. Can they refuse the only way for them to escape from extreme poverty? The answer is no. Therefore, we should act! Act on fairtrade policies by removing market’s interferences (flooted market) for these products, or at least make it a fairer distribution of benefits , more important when prices are high, and when prices are low farmers have a safety net .

We realize the difficulty of the thing when today the practice of margins politics is so strong, How to control a market of consumption also aggressive. I believe that is impossible and therefore that the system of fair trade will not be able to fight in the long-term against the real causes of poverty it ‘s an implosive system so an interim system, and the question that might be asked is simple: When we will realize that it is really time to change to one thing really fair?

[Jean B]

Bonsoir,

M'est avis que tes principales difficultés ne résident pas dans la distinction entre le present perfect et le preterit…!

Elles se situent ailleurs.

Tu ne devrais plus avoir trop de mal à les repérer dorénavant.

This article entitled "supermarket cut of fair trade cash for poor farmers," was published on the Times website, on June 29, 2003. Although this article dates back <of> to 5 years the subject remains topical. Indeed, the development of fair trade since the nineties with <the> coffee, cotton, cocoa has accelerated greatly in recent years and brought about <the> a major change among its <actors> partners: producers, <distributors> retailers and consumers had to evolve, <to develop> to adapt.

Robert Windlett<(majuscule au nom proper) puts forward this evolution, concerning <distributors> supermarkets which excessively take advantage of this strong <'s> trade.

For him, the idea of a fair trade is very well accepted by the English in general. <it> He declares on this subject that <much> many British are willing to pay more for products because they know that this money will be used for the development of poor farmers and obviously to finance infrastructure.

However, through a survey on prices led by John MCabe and the consultants Connector Global, it highlights the fact that the rising of prices is more beneficial <profitable> for supermarkets than for small producers.

He says, consumers are manipulated, they pay prices twice higher for these products but they don't realize that extra pennies for the most part go directly into the coffers of supermarkets.

He gives two examples which show well the 2 speeds of the system. First he mentions Sainsbury<(!) which is the third largest chain of stores in the United Kingdom and which on a selling price of 89 pounds cashes a margin of 65 pounds, it's the 3 / 4. The second positive example <positive><(adjective AVANT le nom) concerns Waitrose<(!!) which according to a survey is the only major supermarket which doesn't have these margins.

Supermarkets have obviously realized that these fair trade products were a very good selling<'s> argument, and thus synonymous with profit. In the rest of his article, Robert Windlett says that the number of licensed fair trade products distributed by supermarkets have increased because supermarkets are exploiting a loophole and can decide the final price of the product.

<In> The second part <it'> is about the power of these major groups, including Wallmart which by the game of competition exert a down<'s> pressure to the bulk<'s> purchase price of bananas. The decision-making power of these companies <are> is obviously very important and even if authorities represented by the Prime Minister of Grenada<(!!!) are intervening their actions are not very convincing.

Indeed, supermarkets remain careful and point out that despite prices they still contribute<s> positively to the third world<s>. Tesco declares on this subject that they contribute<s> to the development of education and health services even if <his> their turnover concerning these products is approximately 1 billion.

In view of this one-way<'s> article which denounces without half measure distributors and their opportunist policies, we could forget positive effects of fair trade label. Indeed the third world needs our help, our support. Obviously, although the few extra pence we pay are low for us, <is> they really make a massive difference for these poor people, to give <to> them and their families more pleasant living conditions <for them and their families>. The question we are faced with is an ethical question, even if supermarkets contribute to a fair trade, have the right to earn so much money by knowing that they could further improve the living conditions of these people. Some play the game as others do not. That's why, actually some official organizations like the fair trade foundation, the DIDF (the Department for International Development and Fair trade) and most recently in 1997 the FLO (Fair trade Labelling Organizations International), [in 2007 fair trade action network with the governments]??? try to develop this trade by maintaining the maximum of equity.

Personally, I think that system has become unhealthy, in fact I believe that this system has become a system based only on enrichment by the exploitation of poor farmers who become in a certain manner prisoners to our market. Can they refuse the only way for them to escape from extreme poverty? The answer is no. Therefore, we should act! Act on fair trade policies by removing market<'s> interferences (flooded(?) market) for these products, or at least make it a fairer distribution of benefits, more important when prices are high, and when prices are low farmers have a safety net .

We realize the difficulty of the thing when today the practice of margins policy is so strong, How to control a market of consumption also aggressive. I believe that is impossible and therefore that the system of fair trade will not be able to fight in the long-term against the real causes of poverty. It's an implosive system so(?) an interim system, and the question that might be asked is simple: when <we> will we realize that it is really time to change to one thing really fair?

[antisthene86]

Un grand merci a vous JRB ,pour cette réponse si rapide.

Je fais tant de fautes , mon grand défaut c'est la longueur de mes phrases, c'est un mauvais reflexe. N'est ce pas bref merci encore.

Vous faites un bon boulot merci de votre aide

[Jean B]

Un grand merci a vous JRB ,pour cette réponse si rapide.

Je fais tant de fautes , mon grand défaut c'est la longueur de mes phrases, c'est un mauvais reflexe. N'est ce pas bref merci encore.

Vous faites un bon boulot merci de votre aide