Ami.33 Posté(e) le 30 avril 2017 Signaler Share Posté(e) le 30 avril 2017 Bonjour je viens de finir ma première notion d'anglais sur "Spaces and Exchanges" et j'amerai avoir une correction si possible, vos avis et conseils Merci d'avance! Spaces and Exchanges : In attempt to understand the world we're living in , we'll be talking about the notion “Spaces and Exchanges”. To begin, we'll explain what an exchange is. An exchange is an act of giving and receiving something else in return. It can also be seen as a continuous movement or circulation. The different spaces of the world are nowadays more and more connected to each other. Exchanges allow spaces to develop. There are different forms of exchanges: people, trade, cultural exchanges, informations or communication. New technologies have changed the way we communicate, the new media enable us to be informed and connected with the rest of the world faster than ever. We can also notice that the gap between the wealthiest and the poorest has widened. Among the whole of the proposition offered by this notion, I have chosen to talk about immigration in the USA., a country seen as a Nation of Immigrants where almost everybody is an immigrant or a descendant of immigrant. WHATS DRIVES PEOPLE TO LEAVE THEIRE NATIVE COUNTRY TO GO AND LIVE IN ANOTHER? To illustrate the notion an to answer to this key question we will be explaining two documents we studied in class this year, which are “Mexicans outsides” and “Obama's Speech”. Here, it's relevant to take the example of the USA, which is linked to the notion Spaces and Exchanges: many immigrants leave their home land in an attempt to get a fresh start in America. Furthermore the notion of exchanges is also present as immigrants each bring a part of their culture that adds to the cultural diversity in the country they leave to. The interaction between two different cultures allow multi-cultural exchange. All across the world, USA is seen as a land of opportunity, and appears that today, the USA remains a very attractive country. Many people all around the world are willing to take their chance there, as they believe in the American dream: that America can allow you to rise socially and live a more comfortable life. As a result of immigration, we can say that America is a cultural melting pot. Over the last decades, the US-Mexico border has been a burning and debated issue. It is one of the longest borders in the world and also one of the busiest. Indeed, it has become a strategic place for legal and illegal business. Not only do commercial exchanges take place there, it is also a nerve centre for drug dealing. The border acts like a magnet for Mexican immigrants who dream of a better life in the USA. The USA appears as a land of opportunities as far as the job market is concerned. That is the reason why many destitute Mexicans cross the border, whether legally or illegally. That is the reason why many destitute Mexicans cross the border, whether legally or illegally. While they move to America hoping for better prospects, they are often offered menial and painful jobs and accept low wages. We can take the example of the cartoon made by the political cartoonist Ted Rall. In the Foreground, we can see a man watching the news on TV, wearing a T-shirt with “Freedom ain't free” written on it. He seems to be indignant about the african migrants situation. Furthermore, we can notice with “those poor African migrants! Drowning! Why don't the Euros let them in?!” that he criticizes the European countries for not reacting. However, in the background, we can see his wife saying “Mexicans outside” as he answers “get my gun”. This suggests that Americans support the fight for African immigrants who try to go in Europe, but they seem to oppose the situation when the mexicans are the ones trying into their country. This cartoon therefore demonstrates the hypocrisy of humans in general, who are sympathetic only when it doesn't involve their own country ( notion of “not in my backyard”). Given the cartoon was made in 2015, we can deduce that this is still an issue today. The second document that I would like to share with you it's The Obama's Speech of November 2014. In fact, President Obama announced a new Amnesty Policy which allowed millions of illegal immigrants to be naturalized as long as they had been in the US for at least 5 years. Immigrants couldn't have an criminal record and they had to pay taxes. But the Republicans disapproved of this decision, they said it would be too complicated. They argued that the President didn't have the authority to decide who was to saty and who was to leave. To finish Obama recalls that the USA is a nation of immigrants which must keep (on) welcoming newcomers. As a conclusion, we can say that even if the Mexican immigration remains debated, it is indisputably a source of economic and cultural wealth for the USA. Even though the USA has always been a country of immigrants, the country's policy towards immigration has evolved, and became more restrictive. In the 19th and 20th century, immigrants were carefully checked at the Ellis Island with medical inspections. Restrictive laws are making it harder for immigrants to match the requirements to enter the country legally: this is why clandestine immigration rose, especially with the mexican border. Nevertheless, the American Dream sometimes turns out to be more an utopia than reality. Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
E-Bahut Jean B Posté(e) le 30 avril 2017 E-Bahut Signaler Share Posté(e) le 30 avril 2017 Bonjour, Il y a 3 heures, Ami.33 a dit : Bonjour je viens de finir ma première notion d'anglais sur "Spaces and Exchanges" et j'amerais << présent conditionnel, dit "de politesse" avoir une correction si possible, vos avis et conseils Merci d'avance! Spaces and Exchanges : In an attempt to understand the world we're living in, weI'll be talking about the notion “Spaces and Exchanges”.<<Emploierais-tu le "nous" de majesté ? To begin, we'll << Idem explain what an exchange is. An exchange is an act of giving and receiving something else in return. It can also be seen as a continuous movement or circulation. The different spaces of the world are nowadays more and more connected to each other. Exchanges allow spaces to develop. There are different forms of exchanges: people, trade, cultural exchanges, informations or communication. New technologies have changed the way we communicate, the new media enable us to be informed and connected with the rest of the world faster than ever. We can also notice that the gap between the wealthier and the poorer has widened.<<Cas d'emploi du comparatif, pas du superlatif. Revois ça dans ta grammaire. Among the whole of the a set/series of propositions offered by this notion, I have chosen to talk about immigration in the USA., a country seen as a Nation of Immigrants where almost everybody is an immigrant or a descendant of immigrant. WHATS DRIVES PEOPLE TO LEAVE THEIRE NATIVE COUNTRY TO GO AND LIVE IN ANOTHER? To illustrate the notion and (to) answer to this key question we will be explaining two documents we studied in class this year, which are “Mexicans outsides” and “Obama's Speech”.<< answer est un verbe transitif direct Here, it's relevant to take the example of the USA which is linked to the notion Spaces and Exchanges: many immigrants leave their home land in an attempt to get a fresh start in America. Furthermore the notion of exchanges is also present as immigrants each bring a part of their culture that adds to the cultural diversity in the country they leave to << Hou là ! >> live in. The interaction between two different cultures allows << sujet au singulier multi-cultural exchange. All across the world the USA is seen as a land of opportunity and appears that today as the USA and still remains a very attractive country. <<Ne mets pas une virgule devant une conjonction telle que "and". Many people all around the world are willing to take their chance there, as they believe in the American dream: that America can allow you to rise socially and live a more comfortable life. As a result of immigration, we can say that America is a cultural melting pot. Over the last decades, the US-Mexico border has been a burning and debated issue. It is one of the longest borders in the world and also one of the busiest. Indeed, it has become a strategic place for legal and illegal business. Not only do commercial exchanges take place there, it is also a nerve centre for drug dealing. The border acts like a magnet for to Mexican immigrants who dream of a better life in the USA. The USA appears as a land of opportunities as far as the job market is concerned. That is the reason why many destitute Mexicans cross the border, whether legally or illegally. That is the reason why many destitute Mexicans cross the border, whether legally or illegally. << Bis repetita While they move to America hoping for better prospects, they are often offered menial and painful jobs and accept low wages. We can take the example of the cartoon made by the political cartoonist Ted Rall. In the Foreground, we can see a man watching the news on TV, wearing a T-shirt with “Freedom ain't free” written on it. He seems to be indignant about the African migrants situation. Furthermore, we can notice with “those poor African migrants! Drowning! Why don't the Euros let them in?!” that he criticizes the European countries for not reacting. However, in the background, we can see his wife saying “Mexicans outside” as he answers “get my gun”. This suggests that Americans support the fight for African immigrants who try to go in to Europe but they seem to oppose the situation when the Mexicans are the ones trying to get into their country. This cartoon therefore demonstrates the hypocrisy of humans in general, who are sympathetic only when it doesn't involve their own country ( notion of “not in my backyard”). Given the cartoon was made in 2015, we can deduce that this is still an issue today. The second document that I would like to share with you it's<< pas de double sujet en anglais >> is The Obama's Speech of November 2014.<< Les règles du génitif ? In fact, President Obama announced a new Amnesty Policy which allowed millions of illegal immigrants to be naturalized as long as they had been in the US for at least 5 years. Immigrants couldn't have an criminal record and they had to pay taxes. But the Republicans disapproved of this decision, they said it would be too complicated. They argued that the President didn't have the authority to decide who was to stay and who was to leave. To finish Obama recalls that the USA is a nation of immigrants which must keep (on) welcoming newcomers. As a conclusion, we can say that even if the Mexican immigration remains debated, it is indisputably a source of economic and cultural wealth for the USA. Even though the USA has always been a country of immigrants, the country's policy towards immigration has evolved and become more restrictive. In the 19th and 20th century, immigrants were carefully checked at the Ellis Island with medical inspections. Restrictive laws are making it harder for immigrants to match meet the requirements to enter the country legally: this is why clandestine immigration rose, especially with through the Mexican border. Nevertheless, the American Dream sometimes turns out to be more an utopia than reality. Congratulations on the overall quality of your English! Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
Ami.33 Posté(e) le 30 avril 2017 Auteur Signaler Share Posté(e) le 30 avril 2017 merciiii beaucoup! Mis à part cela pensez vous que c'est bien et que cela vaut une bonne note? Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
E-Bahut Jean B Posté(e) le 1 mai 2017 E-Bahut Signaler Share Posté(e) le 1 mai 2017 Il y a 14 heures, Ami.33 a dit : merciiii beaucoup! Mis à part cela pensez vous que c'est bien et que cela vaut une bonne note? J'ai égaré ma boule de cristal, néanmoins je pense que oui. Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
Ami.33 Posté(e) le 1 mai 2017 Auteur Signaler Share Posté(e) le 1 mai 2017 Ahah très bien merci, je viens de finir mes deux autres notions pouvez vous me les corriger svp ? Seats and forms of Power: I'm going to talk about the notion seats and forms of power. Firs of all, I would like to give a definition of Power. Power allows the establishment of the political order, social and personal inside a group but can also lead to tensions, conflicts and counter-powers. A seat is a place in which power is placed. There are different forms of Power. It can be exerted in different spheres : economy, politics, media… In relation to the notion, the topic of my presentation will be the power of media. We may wonder to what extent the press can be considered as a form of power. The press is commonly nicknamed the 4th power. The three first powers being the executive, the legislative and the judicial powers. The notion of Power implies basic division between who have and exercise power and those who have none or a little of it. By extension, the 4th power refers to the various means of communication which can be used as counter powers to limit the three other powers. Jim Morrison said “Whoever controls the media controls the mind”. SO,HOW MUCH POWER DO THE MEDIA HAVE OVER US? WHEN POWER IS MISUSED HOW DO THE PEOPLE REBEL AGAINST IT? To illustrate the notion and to answer these key questions we will be explaining two documents we studied in class this year, which are a video of “The Hollywood Ten” and an extract of The Pursuit of Happiness by Douglas Kennedy. The media have become so influential that they can be considered as a power in itself. Indeed, there is no denying that the freedom of the media is the guarantee of the healthy functioning of a democracy. It can thus be used as a lobby against political misconducts for instance. These scandals are usually referred to by the press as « sleaze ». We can take the example of the video we saw this year “The Hollywood Ten”, this year we saw a video of their story. It deals with the Abuse of Power of the media. In 1947, in the USA, Hollywood actors and screewritters had to say whether they were or not members of the communist party. They were called as wiknesses in front of committee, called HUAC (the House Committee on Un-American Activities) whose purpose was to investigate the people suspected of betraying the country giving information to the USSR. Ten of them, the Hollywood Ten, were found greitly of having communist sympathies and spreading communist ideology in their movies. They didn't want to answer the question, they didn't want to justify themselves. They put forward the Bill of Rights, their constitutional rights. They were sentenced to imprisonment. Thousands of people were blacklisted. The American feared that would loose their freedom, that the country would be undermind by the communism. In on another hand, opposing to The Hollywood Ten decided to give up against power, like in this extract of Pursuit of Happiness written by Douglas Kennedy in 2002. Here the power is political. The story is set during the witch hunt happened in he US in the 50's, during McCartheyism. The two characters present in this extract are Sara and Jack, her boyfriend. The story is told from Sara's point of view, we can quote “attempting to look me” (l.34) and also “I said” (l.40). “I” represents Sara who is the narrator. We understand that Sara feels upset and betrayed by her own lover. Jack tries to argue his case by justifying himself. At the end, Sara is indignant about Jack's behaviour. She blames him for having given her brother's name to the FBI. To justify himself, Jack says “They insisted I gaved them name” (l.8); “They insisted, demanded” (l.17). We can deduce that Jack means that the FBI agents put pressure on him, they made him speak against his will. The FBI used psychological violence, if he refused to give names, he would lose his job, second someone else would give those names anyway (this were ruthless) (l.12). Sara says that the Hollywood Ten had the choice when her boyfriend tell her the opposite, in fact, the Hollywood Ten refused to turn in anyone and they went to jail. She thinks her boyfriend is not brave, he didn't have the guns to say “no”. He's a coward. He should not have given Eric's name (brother of Sara). It must have been easier for the Hollywood Ten since they were famous, in the spotlight and so protected by the media. Moreover, they stuck together and supported each other. The feds were very strong at persuading people that there was a conspiracy against the USA and that the security of country was threatened. The FBI represented the law, the authority, the power. Generally speaking, people are trustful to the government. In the end Jack regrets what he did, he feels remorseful and ashamed. Also, he knows hat Sara will not forgive him that he's losing her. As a conclusion we can say that times have changed. The media hold power over us, because they rhythm our lives. Consequently, we have to be careful because we can lose control.From my point of view, the media are a good thing but we have to moderate our use, stay open-minded and critic and also accept the fact there are as many negative points as there are positives ones. Nevertheless, it appears that giving complete freedom to the media may turn out to be dangerous. Myths and Heroes: I'm going to talk about the notion “Myths and Heroes”. Myths and Heroes are at the heart of every civilization and their study are necessary to understand and comprehend every culture. First of all, I would like to give a definition of Myth. A myth allow to study the human condition through the figure of heroes, seats or community. So, the study of stories and heroes consent to prob a popular belief or a tradition which embodies the values of a society. The Myth is after all universal and transposes the vision of each cultural area about their reflexions about human life. The myth is also anchored temporarly in a era, in fact, in the course of history, myths are updated or created once again. While a hero is a person who can be real or fictional, who left his mark on tradition, History or on daily life, it can be also a role model, who is ready to sacrifice his life in order to make things evolved positively. In relation to the notion the subject of my presentation will be the struggle for women rights. HOW MYTHS AND HEROES INFLUENCE THE BEHAVIOUR OF SOCIETY ? We may wonder to what extent this theme illustrates the notion « Myths and heroes ». In the 19th century, it was commonly agreed that women were inferior to men and thus unable to take important decisions. By the end of the century, in the United Kingdom, a movement was funded in reaction to this popular belief. First I decided to study the document of the Suffragettes , which is an article about the Women condition during WWI. The Suffragettes were women who wanted to fight for their rights : their goal was that women would be given a better education and would be granted the right to vote. They started to take peaceful actions but it didn’t work, no one listened to them. That’s the reason why, in 1903, a suffragette, Emmeline Pankhurst, and her two daughters decided to go one step further, even if it implied bypassing the law. Their motto was “deeds, not words !” They broke shop windows, wrote on the walls, chained themselves in front of the Parliament. A lot of women were assaulted and arrested. Some went on hungerstrikes but they were force fed. The first martyr of this movement was Emily Davidson. She ran out in front of the King’s horse on Derby Day in June 1913. This shocking event marked a turning point in the struggle in so far as mentalities started to evolve, added to the fact that during the First World War, women had to do men’s jobs. In 1918, women over 30 were granted the right to vote. Ten years later (in 1928), women over 21 could vote. The Suffragettes’ movement sets a good example of how iconic figures, heroes, such as Emily Davidson were willing to sacrifice their lives to prove their demands were not foolish. It also shows how deeply-rooted some myths or beliefs are, which makes them even more difficult to debunk. I have also chosen another example of the struggle for Women Rights which is an extract from Malala's book, called I am Malala written by Malala Yousafzai in 2014. So, I'm going to explain you the story of Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani activist for female education and the youngest ever Nobel Prize laureate. Malala initially came to prominence when, as an 11 years-old, she wrote a diary for BBC Urdu, giving an account of her school in Mingora town dealt with the Taliban's 2009 edict to close girls's schools. In October 2012 she was shot in the head by a Taliban gunman for “promoting secular education”. She recovered from the attack and was even more determined to continue her campaign which is now worldwide. Her love for education, and her courage in standing up to the Taliban, made her an icon of bravery. To conclude, we saw, through the examples of the Suffragettes and of Malala, that women suffered from preconceived ideas and thanks to their will, some of them gradually made mentalities evolve to be given the chance to live in a more egalitarian society. These women may be considered as heroes even though they were often despised at their times. We have to record that they weren't the only one, others like Gandhi, Martin Luther King fought for Human's Rights. The weren't looking for fame or acknowledgment. The great leaders activists needed to be known, to attract people to join them, to gather followers. Whatever their religions beliefs they defended secular causes. Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
E-Bahut Jean B Posté(e) le 1 mai 2017 E-Bahut Signaler Share Posté(e) le 1 mai 2017 Seats and forms of Power: I'm going to talk about the notion seats and forms of power. Firs of all, I would like to give a definition of Power. Power allows the establishment of the political order, social and personal order inside a group but can also lead to tensions, conflicts and counter-powers. A seat is a place in which power is placed. There are different forms of Power. It can be exerted in different spheres : economy, politics, media… In relation to the notion, the topic of my presentation will be the power of media. We may wonder to what extent the press can be considered as a form of power. The press is commonly nicknamed the 4th power. The first three powers being the executive, the legislative and the judicial powers. The notion of Power implies basic division between those who have and exercise power and those who have none or a little of it. By extension, the 4th power refers to the various means of communication which can be used as counter powers to limit the three other powers. Jim Morrison said “Whoever controls the media controls the mind”. SO,HOW MUCH POWER DO THE MEDIA HAVE OVER US? WHEN POWER IS MISUSED HOW DO THE PEOPLE REBEL AGAINST IT? To illustrate the notion and to answer these key questions we will be explaining two documents we studied in class this year, which are a video of “The Hollywood Ten” and an extract of from The Pursuit of Happiness by Douglas Kennedy. The media have become so influential that they can be considered as a power in itself. Indeed, there is no denying that the freedom of the media is the guarantee of the healthy functioning of a democracy. It can thus be used as a lobby against political misconducts for instance. These scandals are usually referred to by the press as « sleaze ». We can take the example of the video we saw this year “The Hollywood Ten”, this year we saw a video of their story. It deals with the Abuse of Power of the media. In 1947, in the USA, Hollywood actors and screen writers had to say whether they were or not members of the communist party. They were called as wiknesses in front of a committee, called HUAC (the House Committee on Un-American Activities) whose purpose was to investigate the people suspected of betraying the country giving information to the USSR. Ten of them, the Hollywood Ten, were found guilty of having communist sympathies and spreading communist ideology in their movies. They didn't want to answer the question, they didn't want to justify themselves. They put forward the Bill of Rights, their constitutional rights. They were sentenced to imprisonment. Thousands of people were blacklisted. The Americans feared (that) they would loose their freedom, that the country would be undermined by the communism. In On the other hand, opposing to opponents of The Hollywood Ten decided to give up against power, like in this extract of Pursuit of Happiness written by Douglas Kennedy in 2002. Here the power is political. << Ici "opposants" est un nom, pas le participe présent du verbe "opposer". The story is set during the witch hunt that happened in he US in the 50's, during McCartheyism. The two characters present in this extract are Sara and Jack, her boyfriend. The story is told from Sara's point of view, we can quote “attempting to look me” (l.34) and also “I said” (l.40). “I” represents Sara who is the narrator. We understand that Sara feels upset and betrayed by her own lover. Jack tries to argue his case by justifying himself. At the end, Sara is indignant about Jack's behaviour. She blames him for having given her brother's name to the FBI. To justify himself, Jack says “They insisted I gaved them name” (l.8); “They insisted, demanded” (l.17). We can deduce that Jack means that the FBI agents put pressure on him, they made him speak against his will. The FBI used psychological violence, if he refused to give names, he would lose his job, second someone else would give those names anyway (this were ruthless) (l.12). Sara says that the Hollywood Ten had the choice when her boyfriend tell her the opposite, in fact, the Hollywood Ten refused to turn in anyone and they went to jail. She thinks her boyfriend is not brave, he didn't have the guts to say “no”. He's a coward. He should not have given Eric's name (brother of Sara). It must have been easier for the Hollywood Ten since they were famous, in the spotlight and so protected by the media. Moreover, they stuck together and supported each other. The feds were very strong at persuading people that there was a conspiracy against the USA and that the security of the country was threatened. The FBI represented the law, the authority, the power. Generally speaking, people are trustful to the government. In the end Jack regrets what he did, he feels remorseful and ashamed. Also, he knows hat Sara will not forgive him that he's losing her. << Ce délayage est-il bien utile pour ta démonstration ? As a conclusion we can say that times have changed. The media hold power over us, because they rhythm our lives. Consequently, we have to be careful because we can lose control. From my point of view, the media are a good thing but we have to moderate our use, stay open-minded and critic and also accept the fact there are as many negative points as there are positives ones. Nevertheless, it appears that giving complete freedom to the media may turn out to be dangerous. Myths and Heroes: I'm going to talk about the notion “Myths and Heroes”. Myths and Heroes are at the heart of every civilization and their study are is necessary to understand and comprehend every culture. First of all, I would like to give a definition of Myth. A myth allows us to study the human condition through the figure of heroes, seats or community. So, the study of stories and heroes consent to probe a popular belief or a tradition which embodies the values of a society. The Myth is after all universal and transposes the vision of each cultural area about their reflexions about human life. The myth is also anchored temporarly in an era, in fact, in the course of history, myths are updated or created once again. While a hero is a person who can be real or fictional, who left his mark on tradition, History or on daily life, it can also be a role model, who is ready to sacrifice his life in order to make things evolved positively. In relation to the notion the subject of my presentation will be the struggle for women's rights. HOW DO MYTHS AND HEROES INFLUENCE THE BEHAVIOUR OF SOCIETY? << Besoin de réviser la construction interrogative ? We may wonder to what extent this theme illustrates the notion « Myths and heroes ». In the 19th century, it was commonly agreed that women were inferior to men and thus unable to take important decisions. By the end of the century, in the United Kingdom, a movement was founded in reaction to this popular belief. First I decided to study the document of the Suffragettes which is an article about the Women condition during WWI. The Suffragettes were women who wanted to fight for their rights: their goal was that women would be given a better education and would be granted the right to vote. They started to take peaceful actions but it didn’t work, no one listened to them. That’s the reason why in 1903 a suffragette, Emmeline Pankhurst, and her two daughters decided to go one step further even if it implied bypassing the law. Their motto was “deeds, not words !” They broke shop windows, wrote on the walls, chained themselves in front of the Parliament. A lot of women were assaulted and arrested. Some went on hungerstrikes but they were force fed. The first martyr of this movement was Emily Davidson. She ran out in front of the King’s horse on Derby Day in June 1913. This shocking event marked a turning point in the struggle in so far as mentalities started to evolve, added to the fact that during the First World War, women had to do men’s jobs. In 1918, women over 30 were granted the right to vote. Ten years later (in 1928), women over 21 could vote. The Suffragettes’ movement sets a good example of how iconic figures, heroes, such as Emily Davidson were willing to sacrifice their lives to prove their demands were not foolish. It also shows how deeply-rooted some myths or beliefs are, which makes them even more difficult to debunk. I have also chosen another example of the struggle for Women's Rights which is an extract from Malala's book, called I am Malala written by Malala Yousafzai in 2014. So, I'm going to explain you the story of Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani activist for female education and the youngest ever Nobel Prize laureate. Malala initially came to prominence when, as an 11 years-old, she wrote a diary for BBC Urdu, giving an account of her school in Mingora town dealt with the Taliban's 2009 edict to close girls's schools. In October 2012 she was shot in the head by a Taliban gunman for “promoting secular education”. She recovered from the attack and was even more determined to continue her campaign which is now worldwide. Her love for education, and her courage in standing up to the Taliban, made her an icon of bravery. To conclude, we saw, through the examples of the Suffragettes and of Malala, that women suffered from preconceived ideas and thanks to their will, some of them gradually made mentalities evolve to be given the chance to live in a more egalitarian society. These women may be considered as heroes even though they were often despised at the time. We have to record remember that they weren't the only ones, others like Gandhi, Martin Luther King fought for Human's Rights. The weren't looking for fame or acknowledgment. The great leaders activists needed to be known, to attract people to join them, to gather followers. Whatever their religions beliefs they defended secular causes. "Since the dawn of time, society has always needed Myths and Heroes because everybody wants to trust believe/have faith in miracles, that everything can happens... << Hou là ! These persons, real or fictional, give faith to an oppressed population which really needs it." << Pourquoi avoir mis ce dernier verbe au passé ? Lien vers le commentaire Partager sur d’autres sites More sharing options...
Messages recommandés
Archivé
Ce sujet est désormais archivé et ne peut plus recevoir de nouvelles réponses.